- Advertisement -
News

Nothing in constitution allows state elections to affect federal govt, says Azalina

The law minister also cites the anti-party hopping law which prevents MPs from switching camp.

Bernama
2 minute read
Share
Minister in Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Azalina Othman speaks at a press conference in Alor Setar, Aug 7. Photo: Bernama
Minister in Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Azalina Othman speaks at a press conference in Alor Setar, Aug 7. Photo: Bernama

There are no provisions in the Federal Constitution supporting claims that the results of the elections in six states on Aug 12 can lead to a change in the federal government, says Minister in Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Azalina Othman.

Azalina also expressed surprise at how the matter could have been brought up and urged the parties pushing those claims to forward the provisions or laws that they were referring to.

"I have heard many people claiming this, I am very perplexed at how the (state election) results can change the federal government.

"I have read the constitution many times, I have never come across something like that… maybe they have read some other kind of law," she said at a media conference in Alor Setar yesterday.

Media outlets reported on Aug 6 that PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang had claimed that a Perikatan Nasional victory in the six state elections would enable changes in the federal government.

Azalina also said that the anti-party hopping law gazetted through a constitutional amendment prevented MPs from switching parties or bringing the seats they win under a party over to another party.

"If he switches parties… it will trigger a by-election. That by-election is set in the constitution, and it is not something easy or cheap.

"I want to state that Malaysians are quite tired of this, even with the elections in six states, what more a parliamentary by-election, we’ve just finished a general election in 2022, how many elections are we going to hold?" she said, adding that political leaders with such thinking would incur the wrath of Malaysians wishing for political stability and for the government to continue its work.

If the existing government can be retained for the next five years, it will allow government matters to be conducted well, including policy and financial issues, she added.

"That’s why, I myself as a minister in charge of legal matters, it is easier for me to settle cases – for instance, the Sulu case – when I look at our country’s stability with a government that will last for five years. 

"I can go to court with an easy heart, and I can conclude my cases properly.

"If we keep switching governments, changing prime ministers, I fear for the wide-reaching consequences and impact. When you change a prime minister, the Cabinet changes too, and the policies as well," she added.