Sunday, February 28, 2021

Sri Ram never found guilty of prosecutorial misconduct, court told

Deputy public prosecutor says the evidence presented by Sri Ram in all the trials he handled was relevant and admissible.

Other News

Sabah, Sarawak dapat layanan adil, kata Muhyiddin

Terdapat banyak lagi usaha yang perlu dibuat bagi meletakkan kedua-dua negeri berkenaan agar setara dengan Semenanjung.

I have big support, Muhyiddin says as he marks first year as PM

He maintains that he still possesses majority support, rejecting accusations that the state of emergency was a ploy to remain in power.

Muhyiddin tetap perkukuh hubungan antarabangsa

Pandemik Covid-19 tidak bermakna negara tidak memberi perhatian dalam hubungan antarabangsa.

Darurat Covid-19 diperlukan, kata PM

'Saya pun tak tahu parti mana sekarang yang mempunyai jumlah kerusi yang lebih besar daripada saya', kata Muhyiddin.

2,437 kes positif, jumlah jangkitan Covid-19 kini melebihi 300,000

300,752 jumlah keseluruhan kes positif dilaporkan di Malaysia.

The High Court today heard that no court had found former Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram guilty of prosecutorial misconduct that he should be disqualified from conducting the 1MDB audit report tampering trial of former prime minister Najib Razak.

Deputy public prosecutor Ahmad Akram Gharib said this during the hearing of the Pekan MP’s application to disqualify Sri Ram from leading the prosecution team in Najib’s ongoing trial before justice Mohamed Zaini Mazlan.

“That should be the threshold of the application right now – whether he (Sri Ram) has committed prosecutorial misconduct, to which my answer is that he has not.

“The evidence he presented in all the trials that he handled as a representative of the prosecution was relevant and admissible,” he said.

Akram added that the point of bias raised in the application had also been adjudicated, thus making it res judicata or a matter decided.

He referred to a WhatsApp conversation between Sri Ram and former attorney-general (AG) Mohamed Apandi Ali in 2018, which Najib had claimed indicated bias in seeking for Apandi to charge him.

“It was a conversation between two buddies. We can see from the tone of the whole conversation. He (Apandi) started his message to Sri Ram with ‘bro’. From there, the conversation went on,” said Akram.

He said Najib had also submitted in his written submission that Sri Ram was involved in the 1MDB-related investigations, causing him to pre-judge the culpability of the applicant.

“His power to supervise investigations conducted by the investigating officer (IO) in his capacity as a senior deputy public prosecutor cannot be misconstrued as having taken over the investigation itself,” he said.

“The applicant failed to show any evidence that Sri Ram was indeed involved in the investigations against him. As such, the allegation that Sri Ram had taken over the investigations is without basis.”

Najib’s lead counsel, Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, responded that the present disqualification bid did not seek to nullify the whole 1MDB audit trial so far, merely to see that the proceeding is conducted without bias.

“The disqualification we seek here is not punishment of anybody or Sri Ram, but to meet substantive fear of bias, on the matter of predetermination of guilt of Najib by Sri Ram.

“It is protection for the parties and the public, as well as for the wider interest of justice,” said Shafee.

After hearing submissions from both parties, Mohamed fixed Feb 15 for a decision.

This is Najib’s third attempt to recuse Sri Ram from prosecuting in the 1MDB-linked criminal cases. One application was filed in another 1MDB case before a different judge and the second was through a civil proceeding.

On June 12 last year, Najib filed an application to recuse Sri Ram, supported by two affidavits, one filed by Najib and the other by Apandi.

Najib, 67, and former 1MDB CEO Arul Kanda Kandasamy are on trial for charges of tampering with the 1MDB audit report.

The Pekan MP is charged with using his position to order amendments to the final audit report before it was presented to the Public Accounts Committee to avoid any action against him, while Arul Kanda is charged with abetting Najib in making the amendments to the report to protect Najib from being subjected to action.

Follow us on Telegram for the latest updates: https://t.me/malaysianow

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news and analyses.

Related Articles

AmBank bayar Putrajaya RM2.83 bilion disebabkan penglibatan dalam skandal 1MDB

Pembayaran ini akan menguntungkan rakyat Malaysia kata Menteri Kewangan Tengku Zafrul Aziz.

Najib to testify in Rosmah’s graft trial

Her lawyer says Najib will be called alongside other defence witnesses when proceedings begin in June.

Rosmah-Najib’s ‘Can I advise you something?’ phone call admitted as evidence

This reverses the judge's earlier ruling on the audio clips of Rosmah, Najib and several other individuals implicated in the 1MDB saga.

Proksi Jho Low dilantik sebagai penandatangan sah dalam syarikat subsidiari 1MDB

Saksi ke-10 pendakwaan itu mengesahkan bekas pengarah eksekutif 1MDB dan rakan sekutu Jho Low, Terence Geh juga dilantik sebagai penandatangan sah dalam 1MDB GIL.

Najib akan temani Rosmah untuk keputusan kes rasuah esok

Esok, Mahkamah Tinggi akan memutuskan sama ada Rosmah perlu membela diri terhadap pertuduhan rasuah berkaitan projek hibrid solar bagi sekolah di pedalaman Sarawak, atau dibebaskan.