- Advertisement -
News

Najib's allegations against judge Nazlan 'baseless', says prosecution

The prosecution in the SRC International case says Najib Razak could have raised the matter at any time during the trial but did not as it was an invalid issue.

Bernama
2 minute read
Share
Former prime minister Najib Razak. Photo: Bernama
Former prime minister Najib Razak. Photo: Bernama

The prosecution in former prime minister Najib Razak’s SRC International case has described his allegations against the trial judge, Mohd Nazlan Ghazali, as a desperate attempt to nullify the trial.

Deputy public prosecutor Mohd Ashrof Adrin Kamarul, in reply to Najib’s supporting affidavit in his application to obtain a declaration that the SRC International trial is null and void and to request for a retrial, said the issue of conflict of interest involving the judge, who previously held a position in Maybank Bhd, could have been raised during the trial.

Instead, the former prime minister chose not to do so because the issue was invalid, he added.

Nazlan, who was a High Court judge then and is now a Court of Appeal judge, sentenced Najib to 12 years in prison and fined him RM210 million after finding him guilty of seven counts of misappropriating RM42 million in SRC International funds.

On Najib's statement regarding the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's (MACC) investigation into Nazlan, Ashrof said it was full of scandals aimed at defaming Nazlan's reputation as a trial judge.
 
"Najib's alleged personal knowledge of the MACC investigation is untrue because the MACC, as an independent enforcement agency, would not disclose confidential information regarding the ongoing investigation," he added.

Ashrof said there was no conflict of interest when Nazlan sat as the trial judge for the SRC International case and that Najib himself had said there was no allegation of corruption against the judge.

He said the allegation of conflict of interest due to Nazlan’s capacity as the chief counsel and company secretary of the Maybank Group in the RM140 million loan to Puncak Perdana Sdn Bhd and RM4.17 billion to 1MDB could not be proven.

"In any case, the allegation is irrelevant to the charges faced by the applicant (Najib) in this appeal. The real purpose (of the document regarding the alleged conflict of interest), which is a worthless document, is to discredit Nazlan," he said.

On Dec 8 last year, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal led by Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil dismissed the Pekan MP's appeal, after which he took the matter to the Federal Court.

The Federal Court has set 10 days from Aug 15 to hear Najib's final appeal against the conviction, prison sentence and fine imposed on him by the High Court.