- Advertisement -
World

Singapore PM wins S$275,000 in latest defamation suits

High Court judge says the article 'impugned Lee's reputation and character' by alleging he was dishonest.

Reuters
2 minute read
Share
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Photo: AP
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Photo: AP

Singapore’s High Court ordered two news bloggers to pay Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong a combined S$370,000 in damages on Wednesday, over an article about the status of the home of his late father and the city-state’s modern-day founder, Lee Kuan Yew.

The premier filed lawsuits against writer Rubaashini Shunmuganathan and editor Xu Yuan Chen, also known as Terry Xu, over the August 2019 article published on The Online Citizen that included references to a disagreement within the Lee family about what to do with the property.

High Court judge Audrey Lim said the article “impugned Lee’s reputation and character” by alleging he was dishonest.

“This struck at the heart of Lee’s personal integrity and could severely undermine his credibility, not just personally but also as the prime minister, and call into question his fitness to govern with integrity,” Lim said in a written judgement.

Xu, a Singaporean, was ordered to pay Lee S$210,000, while in a separate suit over the same article, Malaysian Rubaashini was ordered to pay S$160,000. Neither immediately responded to requests for comment.

Lee appeared in court in the case in May, during which he said “sensational allegations” had been made.

Lee’s press secretary in a statement on Wednesday said the damages awarded would be donated to charity.

Senior figures in the ruling People’s Action Party, including Lee Kuan Yew, have also sued foreign media and political opponents for defamation, calling it defence of their reputations.

In April, an activist separately turned to crowdfunding in Singapore to raise tens of thousands of dollars to pay Lee damages after the premier sued both for defamation.

Some activists, including the New York-based Human Rights Watch, say such moves are stifling freedom of speech and political opposition.