Monday, February 8, 2021

Kedah MB’s defence of temple demolition unacceptable

State governments must accept and respond rationally to public criticism, not respond with threats of outlawry.

Other News

17 compounded over birthday bash in Langkawi

They were issued compounds of RM1,000 each for violating movement control order SOPs.

Pemimpin Melayu PH hanya berdiam diri ketika kami diserang, kata Thomas

Namun, dakwaan itu dicabar oleh pemimpin kanan Amanah Khalid Samad.

Malay PH leaders watched idly as we non-Malays were racially attacked, says Thomas

But the claim is challenged by Amanah leader Khalid Samad.

Racism and the Palestinian boycott of Israel

The boycott movement aims at holding the oppressor accountable as it places a price tag on military occupation and apartheid.

‘Extreme competition’ with China coming, but not like Trump, says Biden

Biden says he will work more closely with allies to increase pushback against China.

We refer to the statement by Kedah Menteri Besar Sanusi Md Nor justifying the demolition of the 78-year-old Sri Madurai Veeran temple in Alor Setar and calling for MIC to be outlawed for criticising the demolition.

The statement by Sanusi is excessive, provocative and riddled with serious inaccuracies.

Sanusi is reported to have said that “if a temple is built on land where it is not allowed to do so, then it has broken the law”.

This ignores the fact that the demolished Sri Madurai Veeran temple was built during the colonial era by railway workers; it was not illegal when it was built. To suggest or insinuate that the Hindu devotees set out to deliberately build on land that did not belong to them is a serious misrepresentation of the facts.

In fact, the situation of the demolished Sri Madurai Veeran temple in Alor Setar sums up the whole fraught problem of temple demolitions in Malaysia, in which temples which were originally built with permission during the colonial era were rendered “illegal” by subsequent land sales or transfers decades later.

The approach taken by the Kedah government in this case as well as the authorities generally, in hiding behind the “illegality” of the temple structure, betrays insensitivity or ignorance of the religious sentiments of worshippers.

A temple structure cannot be treated like any other building; it carries a religious and social value of great significance to the devotees who attend it as well as the larger Hindu community in the area.

It is bad enough to have forcefully demolished the temple; it is worse to now justify it by legalistic arguments which ignore the historical context in which the temple was originally built and its religious and communal importance. To the worshippers and the local community, it adds insult to injury.

Further, the Kedah MB’s suggestion that MIC be outlawed for criticising the temple demolition is mischievous and heavy-handed. Freedom of speech is guaranteed under Article 10 of the constitution; no organisation can be banned for the exercise of free speech.

State governments are elected by the people, and must accept and respond rationally to public criticism. They must not respond with threats of outlawry.

We would urge the Kedah state government as well as other authorities in Malaysia dealing with disputes on temples to treat the matter with care, sensitivity and understanding of the circumstances and contexts in which the temples were erected. The authorities must engage all stakeholders and intermediaries to ensure amicable resolutions, and avoid at all costs forced demolitions of places of worship.

N Surendran is adviser for rights group Lawyers for Liberty.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of MalaysiaNow.

Follow us on Telegram for the latest updates:

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news and analyses.

Related Articles

ATM tidak berkuasa tahan pesalah PKP, kata sumber

Kenyataan Menteri Pertahanan Ismail Sabri Yaakob semalam merujuk kepada tangkapan dalam Operasi Benteng (Op Benteng).

Overcrowding the problem, not SOPs, rights group says on prison spikes

LFL says any SOPs in place are likely to fail without a significant reduction in number of inmates.

Lawyer schools Ku Li after release of letter backing Dr M’s no-confidence motion

N Surendran says a private member’s motion can only be debated if a minister moves a motion to bring it up.

Rights group slams Singapore over fine on lawyer for mentally ill death row inmate

Lawyers for Liberty says this constitutes 'a serious interference' by Singapore with the prisoner's right to fair trial.