Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Cherry-picking morality in consumerism

Protecting the environment means examining our own behaviour as consumers and where our decisions lie on the spectrum of necessity.

Other News

Lebih 1,000 pendatang Myanmar dihantar pulang hari ini

Program penghantaran pulang itu merupakan sebahagian daripada aktiviti berterusan proses pengusiran oleh Jabatan Imigresen bagi tahanan yang ditempatkan di depot.

Kelonggaran rentas daerah, negeri hantar anak ke sekolah dibincang esok

Keputusan perbincangan itu akan diumumkan Khamis ini dengan mengambil kira sekolah bakal dibuka secara berperingkat bermula 1 Mac.

Saksi nafi gelaran Datuk yang diterima berkait kes 1MDB

Nor Salwani Muhammad, 54,  memberitahu pingat yang diterimanya pada 1 Februari 2020 adalah kerana beliau telah berkhidmat selama 30 tahun di kementerian wilayah persekutuan.

Over 1,000 Myanmar nationals deported despite court order

Immigration chief Khairul Dzaimee Daud says 1,086 migrants have been sent back on three Myanmar navy ships.

Hong Kong to disqualify disloyal politicians, officials

A list of offences includes acts that endanger national security, advocating for independence or refusing to accept China's sovereignty over Hong Kong.

Reading a news report about how a retail chain in the UK is now banning the sale of glitter before this Christmas tipped me over the edge.

We can’t use glitter on our Christmas decorations, we can’t have microbeads in our facial cleansers, we can’t use plastic straws, because all these will harm the environment in one way or another.

Are we forgetting that innovation has allowed us these conveniences?

Yes, protect the environment, but it will take much more than focusing on micro-aspects such as straws, microbeads and glitter.

Protecting the environment through the lens of consumer demand is a narrow view.

Activism means cutting off the head of the snake – government policy, political will, complete stakeholder commitment.

And frankly, we consumers should take some responsibility, too, because our bottomless desire to consume goods is also part of the problem.

If we didn’t want to consume so much by buying all this transient stuff, perhaps we wouldn’t be in the dire situation we are in now.

Do you actually remember the satisfaction you got from the last facial exfoliation or the purple glitter on last year’s Christmas tree?

No, because that gratification was momentary.

It was for that moment, and then you began to worry how long your in-laws were staying after dinner.

We demonise the straw while ignoring the plastic wrap on the frozen chicken and beef. We demonise plastic shopping bags at the supermarket but develop blindness to the plastic wrapping on dinky, disposable items at the DIY store.

And we feel so utterly smug about ourselves for carrying those woven nylon bags for our shopping but ignore the fact that the manufacturing processes that produced our beloved cars and houses all contributed to smoggy skies and polluted waterways.

It seems we like to cherry-pick our moral outrage.

Yet, we do not like examining our cavalier consumption, our “throw-away” culture (“My laptop is two years old, it’s slow, I’m throwing it away and getting a new one”) and, most, importantly, our unchecked desire to buy all things new and shiny.

Perhaps it’s time we curbed our desire to have things even if we don’t need them. Yes, the car is old, but it runs. You have a fatter paycheck and you don’t want to look like a loser among your friends with their Hondas and Beemers, so you chuck the chuggy old Volvo and splash out on a sleek new SUV.

Do you have any idea the carbon footprint of the factory process that made every single part of that car, from the gearstick to the buttons on your in-car stereo?

No. You just cruise along, smug in the feeling that you are no longer embarrassed by your old – but functioning – car.

Yes, buying that car means someone in the automotive industry got paid this month, but we cannot get angry at the failure of nations to stop filling the skies with choking smog and stinking up our rivers and seas with industrial waste when we buy something with our hard-earned dollars but do not care beyond that to hold corporations and governments accountable for the spillover effects of our unchecked consumerism.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of MalaysiaNow.

Follow us on Telegram for the latest updates:

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news and analyses.

Related Articles

More needed to safeguard reserves, activists say as 8,000-year-old forest faces loss of protected status

They call for a shift in decision-making power, warning that the degazettement of the Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve will set a bad precedent.

Fossil fuel pollution causes 1 in 5 deaths globally, study shows

The new study nearly doubles previous estimates of the number of people killed by fossil fuel pollution.

Plastic bag charge won’t cut it, says activist in anti-pollution push

A more effective approach would be a holistic one targeted at enforcing alternative delivery systems based on re-use and refill.

Human activity threatens species survival, study says

UN study finds that most species have increased the distance they travel due to human influence, by 70% on average.

Oceans warmed steadily over 12,000 years, study says

Earth's oceans have been warming consistently throughout the last 12,000 years, according to new research that authors say shows clearly humanity's profound effect on the climate.