Sunday, October 25, 2020

LFL hits out at Singapore minister over ‘misleading’ claim on suit

It also rebuts Singapore's claim that the suit was 'baseless'.

Other News

Polis gesa semua pihak patuhi SOP Covid-19 di kawasan Istana Negara

Polis turut menasihatkan orang awam yang tidak mempunyai sebarang urusan agar tidak berada di kawasan luar pintu Istana Negara bagi mengelakkan kesesakan.

Henti semai kebencian, bersatu perangi Covid-19, kata Azmin

Adalah wajar dan tepat bagi semua pihak bersatu di belakang usaha mengurangkan pandemik dan melandaikan lengkungan Covid-19.

Graduan tinggalkan pasaran pekerjaan untuk perniagaan mikro

Semakin ramai golongan muda menggunakan media sosial dan internet untuk memulakan perniagaan mereka.

Why an emergency declaration is the only way to stop more Covid-19 spikes

No practical solution has been offered so far to overcoming the major reason for the spike in cases we see today: the holding of elections.

Graduates trade job market scrum for the world of micro-business

More youngsters are turning to social media and the internet to launch their own businesses.

Rights group Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) has re-filed its civil suit against Singapore Home Minister K Shanmugam over a notice issued under the island republic’s fake news law on LFL’s expose of reportedly brutal execution methods in Changi prison.

LFL also hit out at the ministry over a press statement yesterday in which it said the group’s initial suit, which it called baseless, was struck out by the High Court in Kuala Lumpur.

“In fact, LFL’s civil suit had simply expired as it was not served yet upon Shanmugam,” its advisor N Surendran said.

“The KL High Court had on Sept 21, 2020 allowed LFL to re-file the civil suit against Singapore, which shows that the suit was far from being ‘baseless’.”

The order was issued to LFL under Singapore’s Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act or Pofma.

In a statement today, Surendran said Singapore’s home ministry had also insinuated that the court papers were never served upon Shanmugam when in fact the attorney-general in a letter to LFL on Feb 13 this year had refused to accept service of the papers.

“In short, Shanmugam and the Singapore government were desperately trying to avoid or delay service of the court papers upon him,” Surendran added.

Urging Singapore to disclose “the real truth” about its execution methods, he said the city-state had refused LFL’s repeated requests for a former prison officer who supplied evidence of the alleged brutality to be granted immunity from prosecution.

“Singapore has refused to grant immunity to enable this whistleblower to give evidence in the Singapore courts,” he said.

“In short, Singapore has done everything possible to ensure that the truth about the brutal execution methods in Changi prison remains buried.

“We will be vigorously prosecuting this civil suit, which is intended to protect the freedom of expression of Malaysians against encroachment by a foreign country.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news and analyses.

Related Articles

Exiled Singaporean charged with paedophilia in US

Amos Yee believes that there is nothing immoral about paedophilia.

Overcrowding the problem, not SOPs, rights group says on prison spikes

LFL says any SOPs in place are likely to fail without a significant reduction in number of inmates.

In historic ruling, Singapore top court quashes death sentence of Malaysian drug mule

Appeals court quashes earlier death sentence based on miscarriage of justice.

Singapore’s world-first face scan plan sparks privacy fears

Millions of people will be able to access government agencies, banking services and other amenities with a quick face scan.

Singapore, Indonesia launching green lane for essential business and official travel

Singapore says it is hoping to begin revitalising Changi airport through the measure.